Tuesday, May 17, 2011

On the Road to One-World Government


            The emergence of a world government is inevitable. The increasing use of the United Nations to solve international problems is the first step towards this autocracy. Over the past few months the United Nations has been busy dealing with the rebellions and conflicts in countries such as Syria and Libya. Although we consider ourselves an autonomous, free nation, we are still subjected to the opinions and beliefs of other world leaders. Why is this? Because the congruency of differing nations is becoming a hotly desirable characteristic. Nations feel compelled to cooperate and be a part of this global governing power to ensure they will be included in the benefits such an autonomy offers. At the current rate, we can expect to see a one-world government sooner than later.
          
            The dominating factor concerning what is or is not a state is characterized by Luis Cabrera in saying “I define the state as an organization possessing a monopoly on the legitimate use of organized violence within a society” (Pg.29). This definition asserts that as soon as a government can use its power on the citizens, those citizens then fall under that state. With this definition being defined, we can transfer this meaning to modern times. It is a well-known fact that American forces have been in the Middle East for close to ten years enforcing American ideals. In order to preserve American freedom, so it is said, we have been waging war in foreign countries trying to find “terrorists”. Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein are two primary examples. In regards to these two suspected terrorists, America has been using “legitimate use of organized violence” to capture them and bring them to justice. What does this mean for the world? It means that although we have territorial boundaries, these boundaries can be ignored and battles can be fought anywhere as long as it falls under the veil of promoting democracy and ending terrorism.
          
             Coinciding with these points, we can take a look at the formation of the European Union (EU). This formation consolidated 27 previously autonomous nations into a single state. What was the purpose of this consolidation? To make governing Europe easier. If this type of wide-scale convergence of powers is possible in a modern state, it is inevitable that it is possible to continue further. Once the autonomy of a single country is eliminated, it makes future eliminations of autonomous countries a foreseeable possibility. The ease of communication in today’s technologically advanced society furthers the ability to sculpt the world into a one-world government. We no longer concern ourselves with what only happens on American soil. We are increasingly becoming more and more willing to intervene in world affairs to ensure that our global society remains as our leaders want it. As we continue to be concerned in world affairs it is inevitable that one day a one-world government will be established to ensure that global law is regulated and enforced.
           
Cabrera, L. 2011. Global Governance, Global Government. Published by State University of New York                  Press. Albany, NY.

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Reliance on Social Networking

             In order to fully understand how connected our world currently is, we can take a look at the recent Osama Bin Laden slaying. As soon as the news broke that U.S. forces had killed Bin Laden people were flocking to Facebook and other social networking sites to confirm the news. Thousands of people attending the Philadelphia Phillies baseball games were shown in the crowd staring at their phones, awaiting the news. A man in Pakistan was even noted as giving a live play-by-play of the raids on Twitter. These examples show how influenced and reliant the world is on social networking.
            
            Sohaib Athar, an IT consultant who lives a few miles away from Bin Laden’s compound in Abbottaad, Pakistan, was the man responsible for live-tweeting the Bin Laden attack. His first tweet read: “Helicopter hovering above Abbottaad at 1AM (is a rare event)”. Although Athar did not know he was directly reporting world news, he was. He immediately began accumulating thousands of followers on Twitter who wanted to hear more from him. Were people rushing to news sources or government forums? No. People were relying on social networking to get their news.
             
            During the Philadelphia Phillies baseball game on Sunday night, the news of Bin Laden’s death seemed to erupt at once. People were shown looking at their phones and showing other people the news they were reading on their phones. Once enough people understood what was going on, the crowd began to chant “USA!” for over 5 minutes. Would this have been possible 10 years ago? The answer is no. We are in a modern state where technology is dominating our world. Wherever we go, to a baseball game, the movies, dinner, etc, we can be immediately interrupted by our digital devices if there is pressing enough news.
          
     What does this digital domination mean for our society? This new phenomena can be viewed as being a positive and a negative. It is beneficial to have a media outlet which allows people to post breaking news so others can see it. On the other hand, with the amount of information being transferred through digital devices it makes us more reliant on those devices. It persuades people to check their social networks sites regularly to make sure there is something that they did not miss. We are in the age of technology, and this presence of technology was clearly evident on Sunday, May 1 with the breaking news of Osama Bin Laden’s death. We must ensure that the benefits of technology persuade us to become reliant slaves of that same technology.


 Video: Phillies Fans Chant “USA” After News of Bin Laden’s Death

http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/national/man-who-live-tweeted-bin-laden-raid-talks-to-abc15

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/video-phillies-fans-chant-%E2%80%9Cusa%E2%80%9D-after-news-of-bin-laden%E2%80%99s-death